This website uses cookies for anonymised analytics and for account authentication. See our privacy and cookies policies for more information.





The voice of Scotland’s vibrant voluntary sector

Published by Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

TFN is published by the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Mansfield Traquair Centre, 15 Mansfield Place, Edinburgh, EH3 6BB. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation. Registration number SC003558.

Social care: the nanny state must retreat

This opinion piece is over 7 years old
 

Martin Sime on why we need a new system of social care

Martin Sime
Martin Sime

Barely a day goes by without new revelations about the crisis in social care.

Across the UK, national and local governments are struggling to cope with growing demand and rising costs at a time of budget cuts and public sector austerity. Something has to give.

Here in Scotland, care is big business. Billions are spent on adult social care and many thousands of staff are employed by local authorities, charities and private companies to deliver services to people who need help to live as independently as possible. Social care services are a lifeline for many people.

The case for reform is urgent. Each year more people are assessed as needing social care support, at least in part because we are all living longer and our population is ageing.

But the debate about what to do for the future has hardly started since crisis management is the order of the day.

Finding more money for social care may sound like an answer but raising taxes and charges is unlikely ever to be enough.

Over the next decade our demography and rising life expectancy will outstrip what any government or taxpayers could reasonably offer. Estimates suggest that very soon every school leaver would be needed for the care industry. That was before Brexit threatened to reduce the workforce. It’s clear that more of the same won’t do.

A good starting point for the future is that care is personal. It’s what people feel they need that matters most. There is a growing coalition who believe that personalised, person-centred and self-directed are the principles which ought to prevail in the future. The nanny state needs to retreat.

Care is also social. We could build a rather different system from the bottom up which enhances and supports the role which friends, relatives and neighbours could play. A stronger society will be better equipped to cope with the future of social care and, one way or another, we will all have to take some responsibility for that.

More needs done at the prevention end of social care, helping people to stay active and independent for as long as possible. A whole generation of recently retired people could be encouraged to help with community transport, lunch clubs, care and repair projects, befriending schemes and much else. These need to become the bedrock of our future system rather than the afterthought they are just now.

Of course some people will still need professional support and formal social care services. Reform is needed elsewhere so these vital services are not jeopardised. A new slimmed-down bureaucracy based on a single assessment formula and aligned with social security would also help. At the very least it would be fairer and transparent - people who need social care might even understand their rights rather better than they do now.

The biggest challenge to more self-directed social care is psychological. People will need convinced that taking personal responsibility is right and doable for themselves, their families and friends.

They will need trusted support and access to information and independent advocacy. Various vested interests will need convinced that jobs and budgets cannot be guaranteed. Politicians and regulators will need to recognise that all human interactions involve degrees of risk but enabling people to make judgements for themselves is the right thing to do.

The big message is that helping ourselves and helping each other are two sides of the same coin. We know from pioneering work by people with long-term conditions that self and mutual help really does work. With very modest investment these community networks reduce demand on formal services, including the NHS. If more people can get together to meet their social care needs in a similar way then everybody wins.

Scottish public services need to adapt to the demands of a much changed world, including a greater expectation that people want more control over their own lives and more say over what is done for them.

As a country we surely want to live within our means. A more personal and sustainable approach to social care needs to be at the front and centre of that ambition. There is no plan B.

Martin Sime in chief executive of the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations.

 

Comments

0 0
Andy Kerr
over 7 years ago
Martin may benefit from a visit to some SCVO member organisations when he makes such ill informed statements?Happy to welcome him to the coalition as a late member."A good starting point for the future is that care is personal. It’s what people feel they need that matters most. There is a growing coalition who believe that personalised, person-centred and self-directed are the principles which ought to prevail in the future. The nanny state needs to retreat. Read more at http://thirdforcenews.org.uk/blogs/social-care-the-nanny-state-must-retreat#ZYQf29A6OhWQbF6u.99"
0 0
Angela Morgan
over 7 years ago
Martin may also benefit from listening to those who know about community capacity building for example the Scottish Community Development Centre and its extensive network in order to properly understand the barriers to his contention that "People will need convinced that taking personal responsibility is right and doable for themselves, their families and friends". Read more at http://thirdforcenews.org.uk/blogs/social-care-the-nanny-state-must-retreat#lLt99eCyEqmOXJ4w.99
0 0
Angela Mulraney
over 7 years ago
Strange to see Martin Sime advocating th 'big society' of care when in recent months, TFN has been the mouthpiece for a certain highly paid but largely disliked 3rd sector CEO advocating just the opposite. SCVO should look closely at the viability of large scale care delivered by it's voluntary sector members and make them read this article. The line is now blurred between CCPS and Scottish Care members - and charity CEOs on £100k+ shouting for more money aren't doing the sector any favours.
Commenting is now closed on this post