This website uses cookies for anonymised analytics and for account authentication. See our privacy and cookies policies for more information.





The voice of Scotland’s vibrant voluntary sector

Published by Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations

TFN is published by the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Mansfield Traquair Centre, 15 Mansfield Place, Edinburgh, EH3 6BB. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations (SCVO) is a Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation. Registration number SC003558.

New information reveals huge number of complaints against fit-for-work assessors

This news post is about 7 years old
 

Complaints were made against nurses carrying out assessments on behalf of the DWP

More than 1,600 complaints have been made against nurses carrying out fit-for-work assessments in the last five years.

A freedom of information request to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) by disability rights campaigner John Pring revealed around 7% of an estimated 4,800 complaints a year received by the NMC over the last five years have been linked to nurses working for a benefits assessment contractor.

Pring said it points to “a far-reaching, institutional problem that stretches across DWP and the two private sector contractors” namely Atos Healthcare and Capita that carry out the personal independence payment (PIP) assessments on its behalf.

Atos carries out face-to-face assessments for PIP in Scotland, the north of England, London and southern England, and until 2015 also carried out work capability assessments (WCAs), which test eligibility for out-of-work disability benefits.

WCAs are now carried out by the US outsourcing giant Maximus – which took over the contract from Atos following years of complaints while Capita carries out PIP assessments in Wales and central England.

According to information contained in the FOI request, alleged dishonesty includes assessors refusing to accept further written evidence from medical experts; wrongly claiming detailed physical examinations had been carried out during the assessment; refusing to list all of a claimant’s medications; ignoring or misreporting key information told to them during the assessment; and reporting that a claimant had refused to co-operate with a physical examination, when they were unable to complete it because of their impairment.

Pring says in an article that the NMC has warned that an accurate figure for the number of complaints against assessment nurses could be over 1,600.

Our providers are committed to providing a high-quality, sensitive and respectful service - DWP

The disability campaigner has now submitted a fresh freedom of information request for more detailed information for 2016 only, which NMC has agreed to provide.

However the DWP dismissed the importance of the findings.

A spokeswoman said: “The department cleared 1.9 million PIP claims between 1 December 2013 and 30 September 2016, and in that time only a very tiny proportion of complaints regarding Atos and Capita’s delivery of PIP were accepted for investigation from the Independent Case Examiner [which deals with appeals that follow complaints rejected by the assessment companies, rather than those submitted through the NMC].

“Our providers are committed to providing a high-quality, sensitive and respectful service by conducting fair, accurate and objective assessments.

“We have independent audit in place to ensure advice provided to DWP decision makers is of suitable quality, fully explained and justified.”

 

Comments

0 0
Caroline Sylvester
about 7 years ago
For over two years the tumor in my head has been regrowing, making me crazy and confused, my senses are fading and it will only get worse, yet I'm facing my 3rd PIP assessment, face to face with an unqualified stranger for 10 minutes to be judged.
0 0
mark brewer
about 7 years ago
I though nursing was meant to be a caring profession. Obviously not
0 0
Malcolm Glynn
about 6 years ago
i suoervised two appeals by a disabled claimany whose benefits weres topped as fit for work. Both appeals succeeded. Lawyers represented him at the last hearing and it was obvious the assessors reports were a complete fabrication contrived [deliberately] as many are to deliberately cancel the claimants entitlement to benefits. The stress involved in fighting these abuses of process took its toll. The claimant died on the 9th December 2017. I write this time to offer a suggestion that the corrupt low lifes who refuse lawful benefits for the mentally ill and disabledand and who are paid vast sums of taxpayers cash to do it by this government, should rightly, rot in hell.
0 0
Julie stevenson
about 7 years ago
My husband is waiting to go to tribunal next month for esa has illnesses for years then all of a sudden hes found fot for work the assesment wad made with wrong medical evidence which was my sons sent by mistake by my gp but they still carried on with medical my gp has said I shouldnt be found fit for work but dwp do not listen these assesments are all wrong when you read they get bonuses for getting sick people off esa its a disgusting system putting people though this its awful we have had this worry for last three months dont know what will happen if appeal dosnt work its all so cruel
0 0
Jenny ward
about 7 years ago
Atos and Capita, They are a bunch of Liars, How can a 30-40 min interview by a person who has no In depth knowledge of a lot of people's illnesses have president over a consultant or a Gp , They ask you a load of questions that have nothing to do with your illness and base their PROFESSIONAL opinion based on what you can do and not what you can't. In the case of ESA. Do these people realise they are assessing your illness on what is going to be for sone people a 8 hour day ...5 days a week . I for one will fight these people all the way....as that's what they Hope you will do give up. Ok I will try to find work, nothing I want better, but what happens if due to my disability I cause an accident , who will take the blame then for their assessment that I am fit for work . Absolute disgrace talk about discrimination against disabled people , these people are the biggest culprits .
0 0
Maldwyn Evans
about 7 years ago
When i went to my assessment it was 5pm and the assessor had been drinking i made a complaint to the firm and to the DWP to no avail the illness i have is degenerative so it worse as time but I was signed off and not a word was said about the assessor drinking habits
0 0
Tristen Saarikoski
about 7 years ago
I recently had a kidney removed due to cancer. I already have ptsd,depression,anxiety issues that I have been trying to deal with but getting the mental health issues is almost impossible. I have a condition known as endometriosis a common condition for women but often misdiagnosed. I suffer with contraction pains as if giving birth and on Heavy painkillers that are 2nd thing from morphine and often make me tired and very disorientated. I have osteoarthritis in a foot that gives out when trying to walk and had many falls. I'm also pre cancerous in womb that causes pain too yet the cow that came to see me Kirsty Kirk that looked nothing like a medical professional. My partner let her in as I live in an upstairs flat and stairs are a real struggle for me. We are on waiting list for ground floor flat to help me get out easier. She didn't look at any of the supporting evidence nor take it with her. She totally lied about what was said and was pretty rude. I'm fit for work apparently even though I have surgery every 6 months.
0 0
roscoe outterside
about 7 years ago
The female doctor in my assesment lied in the first sentance on my dwp letter turning down any further assistance.I have and have had crippling and painful rhumatoid arthiritus for over 15 years at least,now im losing my income my home and my mind which will leave me nothing but to end my life as i cannot go through all this for a second time!!taken 15 years to be homed,get carpets etc and make that home/refuge! get dla, rhamatoid specialist and treatment,now losing disability car and all benefits,on £55 ppw.I wont be able to go to doctors get pain medications i rely on,get to hospital for chemtherapy etc.I am preparing to end my life when the reality of it kicks in.SAD world and SAD society that allows this to keep happening to us in the bottom of society!
0 0
Jane Harris
about 7 years ago
I recently had another f2f with Atos and yet again they did not listen to what I said or write down what I said, because of Atos I lost my motability car which I had had for 5 years which virtually made me housebound. These people just don't listen. I went to tribunal last year and won enhanced care only for Atos to take it away in November the same year because they don't believe my illnesses or disability or even that my depression is made worse by the way my life is mapped out now. So now I am waiting for yet another tribunal date to go and try and get their decision over turned for care and mobility even though I had letters from my 3 carer's and doctor it didn't make a scrap of difference. Something needs to be done about these unqualified people no wonder people ar dying because of these stupid organisations.
0 0
John Evans
about 7 years ago
One of the problems with the system is that firms like Atos and Capita are effectively exempt from doing any quality checks on their assessors and the rubbish they write. I'm currently challenging a report that contains 19 spelling mistakes (knees is repeatedly spelled 'needs'), three comments that are complete gibberish (can anyone explain what 'didn't visible seeing' or 'seeked advise' mean?) and three statements that are contradictory. The Capita assessor, Sarah Elizabeth Fisher, also claimed at the beginning of the assessment to be a specialist orthopaedic nurse, something Capita say is untrue and which she now denies. The problem is that Capita's 'defence' to this foul up is that, as DWP didn't see any need to query the report, there was nothing wrong with it. The situation isn't helped by the fact that the DWP staff who dealt with the initial decision making and the mandatory reconsideration are about as literate (strictly speaking semi-literate) as the assessor.A neighbour has just learned that his PIP report states he walked 25 metres from his car to the front door of the assessment centre. Taking aside the fact that he didn't walk it in the accepted sense of the word using a handheld lasar measure the true distance turned out to be just 12 metres.Around April the PAC (Public Accounts Committee) are re-reviewing the whole of private sector assessments for DWP. If you have any badly written reports like this please forward them to the PAC - their contact details are online and they will accept evidence by email or post.
0 0
George Newall
about 7 years ago
It was a Nurse who did my claim for PIP and i found her very good at what she was doing. Peviously looking at a doctor who did one for me and the nurse i found she was the better of the two. She was more profesional and understanding.
0 0
Pauleen
over 6 years ago
The deceitful person I saw . Talked about herself.her health. Her dog her partner etc. my partner had just died and she was so cold and un caring. Wrote I was calm and relaxed. Even thought I sat crying when asked about who helped me with the form. She has denied that I told her why I was upset. The interview was prolonged as my chronic pain escalated because she talked so much about herself. She made continual comments about my clothes my jewellery etc. Acted surprised when I related jobs I had had. I pointed out to atos that I wasn't always sick and disabled and elderly. When questioned about the complaints i made. Has lied and has now changed her story about my ability to do the pince test and that as I could get my rings off this was the basis of her professional change of opinion as to what she wrote in the original report. Disgusting and ridiculous.i am going to make further complaint about this as it has been alleged that I was pretending I couldn't do it. I have degenerative spinal column disease and elderly. It is not getting better.I also have lots of other health issues. She was so self centred and totally uncaring. She also said that talking about herself put the claimants at ease in making them feel she was sympathetic. Totally rubbish. These individuals are working for a company who are profiting from the targeting and causing distress further ill health for the sick and disabled to carry out a money grabbing recouping without any responsibility for the misery they are causing. Its costing more to pay these people to abuse our human rights than it would cost to give sick people the support they are entitled to.
0 0
Malcolm Glynn
about 6 years ago
Further to my last comment it is worth pointing out to the thousands of distressed disabled and mentally ill claimants out there that any assessor, physio therapist or doctor who writes false information on behalf of any claimant to deny that person access to his or her lawful antitlement to benefits is committing a criminal offence. The actual offrence is " avoiding liabilities by deception contrary to sections 2 and 4 of the 2006 Fraud Act. The means used of ignoring medical records and statements by doctors is sufficient to justify that charge for information to be laid before magistrates. The normal appeals process will not work in the instant case because this problem is endemic and too widespread. The paperwork is being buried systematically in warehouses without letters and complaints being opened or replied to. Only registered letters are replied to the rest are ignored within the corrupt system imposed by these corrupt companies to save money on staff and processing claims. The criminal code is warranted and alleging also misfeasance in public office against DWP officials is more than justified and I would suggest by the sheer volume of evidence Conspiracy to impose a system which has the known effect of avoiding ot obstructing their clients liabilities for profit would also work.. My point bluntlky made is that these abuses are so widespread and damaging to the claimants that the abuses clearly evidenced fall under the criminal code and outside of usual avenues of civil redress against a complicit executive arm of government. These people need locking up..
0 0
charly
almost 6 years ago
ATOS were great compared to maximus
0 0
Stuart olowu
about 5 years ago
They always come up with the same convoluted claptrap including “ we’re committed to providing ethical impartial blah blah blah assessments “ my PIP report contained a statement that I was seen to walk 100 meters unaided by an unknown 3rd partyWho all of a sudden seems to have vanished off the face of the earth and no one knows who said that , yet it was included in the Atos Hp report , and ICE are about as much use as a chocolate fire poker
0 0
Christian
almost 5 years ago
Its all the tories fault they dont care about sick and disabled people and nor does the media if the tories carry on with these stupid no good assesements then we will all be found fit for work its like they dont believe your doctor,consultant,physician they make the public believe we are all scroungers hate the tories
0 0
Lesley
over 4 years ago
4 weeks after having a grade 3 brain hemorrhage I was declared fit for work. Too poorly to take it to court! Registered partially blind n the stress of it making me sicker!
Commenting is now closed on this post